Overall conclusion

My overall conclusion of this unit of work is that I feel I have tackled it well. I feel that even when I was struggling to find primary data or when I was struggling to narrow my hypothesis more, I persevered and tried to look at it from a different angle. One thing I think I was particularly good at was researching the contextual influences on comic books. I felt this was a really important part of why the language of comic books may be the way it is because any media that’s produced is always reflective of the society it comes from. I felt I did thorough research on these contextual influences by looking at a range of secondary sources.

For the exam, I will make sure I label my terminology accurately and include a range of different frameworks, stretching myself to include ones I struggle with more like phonology. I will also work on being more concise in the point I’m trying to make, particularly in my introduction as this will help me to structure my essay better as I can more effectively link back to the points I made in my introduction. I will also make sure I focus mostly on gender theories, although I will also try to bring in my knowledge of other theories such as power and face.

Essay response

The question I wanted to answer by conducting my research was whether superhero comics use language to convey traditional gender roles for both men and women. I predicted that for the most part superhero comics would use the fixed gender roles that society has become accustomed to. I also predicted that as far as gender fluidity went, superhero comics would stick to binaries of male and female. My main focus was to look at whether male characters showed traits of toxic masculinity, and if the female characters were portrayed as inferior.

When conducting my research I found that the older primary data were much more obvious in the way they conveyed traditional gender roles. In a 1938 Superman comic, superman is portrayed as a very masculine character, focusing on forcefulness and strength. He uses deontic modality through the use of the modal verb ‘must’ which is an example of a negative face threatening act. This suggests that he feels he has the power to force someone to do something they wouldn’t have otherwise done. Furthermore, he also uses the adverb ‘now’ to reinforce his power, which in turn conveys his strength. The inclusion of these traits of toxic masculinity could be influenced by historical factors such as the fact that America was at risk of war at the time. The media would want to portray force and strength as being a positive thing so that the general public would support their country if they had to go to war. Even 20 years later these traditional gender roles are still very prevalent. In a 1966 publication of The Avengers, the female character, Wanda, is seen to adhere to the expected gender role f a woman. In terms of discourse, her speech is all inner monologue, whereas the male characters are mostly outspoken. This suggests an inferiority to men as her words are not deemed important enough to be heard by all. She uses interrogatives such as ‘or am I just confusing pity with the dawning of love?’ to show uncertainty in herself, adhering to Lakoff’s deficit theory that women use frequent interrogatives in their speech. She is also referred to with the concrete noun ‘chick’ by a male character. This reinforces a sense of inferiority as this is a baby animal that is defenceless and powerless. These examples from my primary data support my hypothesis as up until this point in time male characters are portrayed as stereotypically masculine and females are portrayed as being inferior to their male counterparts. These attitudes to gender are what I expected to see when conducting my investigation.

However, what I did not expect to see was that this slowly starting changing around the 1970s. In a 1977 issue of The Justice League the inclusion of onomatopoeia through the use of attack words like ‘clang’ and ‘bam’ show that the female character, Wonder Woman, possesses some strength and physical abilities. The fact these are directed at Superman suggests that she is an equal match for him. This disproves my hypothesis as this is quite un-traditional. However, at the time American society was nearing the end of the second wave of feminism which would’ve influenced the amount of power women were perceived to have. This source however, does only convey a gradual change in inclusion of gender roles as there are many stereotypes still included. For example, the use of marked and unmarked terms continues this idea that women are inferior to men. Wonder Woman is referred to with the common noun ‘princess’, whereas she refers to another male character with the common noun ‘master’. The noun ‘princess’ suggests that she is defenceless and cannot save herself without the help of a man. This is very different to the connotations of the noun ‘master’ which suggests a large sense of control and that Wonder Woman in submissive. Since these are both examples of gender stereotypes this does support my hypothesis as it is clear these themes are present in superhero comics over a long period of time.

One source that does completely disprove my hypothesis is a 1993 Avengers comic which completely breaks traditional gender role. The female character, Black Widow, is seen to be in a traditionally male role. This can be seen through the semantic field of technology, created with the common noun ‘scans’ and concrete noun ‘energy echo’. This shows a female character to possess intelligence, a very uncommon idea to see within superhero comics. She also uses simple declaratives such as ‘we have a problem’ to convey certainty and confidence within herself. This disproves Lakoff’s deficit theory that women’s speech frequently includes interrogatives. These ideas are much more representative of what women at the time would think of themselves; that they are intelligent and capable of anything. It also reflects cultural changes that by this point in time it wouldn’t be unusual for a woman to go to university or enter what would’ve been traditionally male professions.

To conclude, my hypothesis was disproven as although traditional gender roles and stereotypes were common themes within comic books over a long period of time, there is evidence that these themes have started to change from the end of the 20th century. Interestingly, these changes do seem to correlate with cultural developments in society, and attitudes to women changing. For example, in the mid-90s American society had already witness two waves of feminism and were starting to enter a third. This alone would’ve altered attitudes towards women as they were powerful enough to influence change to the amount of rights they had, as well as how equal they were seen to men. As a result it would be unfair to say that modern comic books include these outdated attitudes towards men and women, even though older publications do convey this. It can only be assumed that the reason for this was due to the oppression women were experiencing in society at the time.

Primary source analysis

Superman 1938

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is img_1946.jpg


This source is quite representative of the sub-topic details as it shows a very fixed and traditional form of male gender identity. The character of Super-man conveys himself as very forceful and stereotypically masculine through the use of deontic modality with the modal verb ‘must’. He also uses the adverb ‘now’ to show that he ignores instructions which also implies a sense of arrogance. These qualities are features of the concept of toxic masculinity which was a significant part of society at the time, particularly since America was at risk of war so men were to be seen as masculine if they went to fight, something that would require traits of forcefulness and arrogance that they would win.

Avengers 1966


In some ways this source isn’t representative of the sub-topic info as the same ideas of gender identity from the 1938 comic of Superman are present in this comic from 1966, even though culturally there has been many improvements in society for the roles of women, including the amount of rights they have. In this source the female character is portrayed as inferior to the male characters. Her dialogue takes the form of an inner monologue, supporting Jones’ theory that one of main purposes of women’s speech is to gossip or share secrets. She uses the third person male pronouns ‘he’ and ‘him’ to emphasise that the purpose of her speech is to talk about a man and also uses the adjective ‘appealing’ which is an example of super politeness according to Lakoff’s deficit theory. Although this could be a reflection of traditional gender roles still being upheld in society, it could also be reflecting the fact that many of the writers would’ve been males, and this could be their reaction to the Second Wave of Feminism which was in fact changing gender identity, particularly of females, at the time.

Justice League 1977

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is img_1913.jpg

This source was published in the second half of the 20th century so according to the sub-topic info, gender roles should be starting to become less fixed in comics. In some ways this comic does reflect this, particularly through the use of onomatopoeia, using attack words like ‘clang’ and ‘bam’. This conveys to the audience that a female character does possess strength and that she can be an equal match for her male counterparts. However, there is a phonological difference in the attack words for example ‘bam’ ends in a much softer bilabial sound whereas Superman’s attack words begin and end in harsh plosives. This suggests there is still a gap between genders with regards to their physical abilities. This idea of inferiority and lack of strength continues through the use of marked and unmarked terms. Wonder Woman is referred to with the common noun ‘princess’ whereas Wonder Woman refers to another male character in the comic with the common noun ‘master’. The use of ‘master’ reinforces this idea that men have more power, and the fact it’s spoken by Wonder Woman herself indicates a sense of submissiveness. This is very different to the common noun ‘princess’ which implies she is incapable or defending herself and needs a male’s support. This is not representative of the sub-topic info as these are the same ideas of gender that are present in comics from the 1940s.

Spiderman 1982

At the time when this source was published it was nearing the end of the 20th century so we would expect to see gender becoming more fluid and gender roles becoming blurred. This can be seen in this Spider-Man excerpt, particularly in the way Spider-Man uses the common noun ‘captain’ to address the female character. This is significant as it shows respect towards women and portrays a female character in a traditionally male job role, suggesting that she has instrumental power. This also is mirroring society in the way that women were starting to be accepted into all different types of job roles and not just the clerical ones they were used to. However, there are still traits of toxic masculinity in this comic which is made even more interesting by the fact Spider-Man is a much younger character. A semantic field of fitness is created through the use of the concrete nouns ‘balance’, ‘ability’ and ‘muscles’. In terms of pragmatics, he also uses sarcasm ‘you really should lock your windows captain’ which is a negative face threatening act through the use of the modal verb ‘should’. This implies he has both strength and power through belonging to a more dominant social group. As a result this source is not representative of the sub-topic info as although gender roles for women may have shifted, the traditional roles for men are still very much prevalent.  

The Avengers 1993


This is arguably the only source from all of my primary data that completely represents the sub-topic info. The female character here is portrayed as being completely equal to her male peers. She uses simple declaratives like ‘We have a problem’ which disproves Lakoff’s deficit theory that women use many interrogatives. It also shows certainty and confidence in herself that she is right; she doesn’t need reassurance from her male co-workers. There is also a semantic field of technology created through the use of concrete nouns like ‘scans’ and ‘energy echo’. This in itself breaks gender roles as she’s taking on a traditionally male role and showing that she has more expertise in this area than the male character. This is reflective of society at the time as it was now normal for women to go to university and study for different professions including those within STEM fields. There is also use of colloquialisms between the male and female character as they address each other with the nicknames ‘widow’ and ‘cap’. This breaks the traditional idea that women and men can’t co-exist in the workplace without becoming romantically involved and this is a much more accurate of a real-life workplace.

Secondary source evaluation

https://www.open.edu/openlearn/history-the-arts/culture/media-studies/superqueeroes-gender-and-superheroes#

This is an article written for the ‘OpenLearn’ website for the Open University. Parts of it were useful however most of the article was about superhero movies rather than comics. I found the section entitled ‘battling the super-binary’ most useful as it gave a general overview of gender identity in comics and talked about how gender binaries are most commonly used. Since this website is produced by an education facility, there is an element of trust that there is unlikely to be any bias. However, if it was written by a woman there may be elements of gender bias.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbeswomanfiles/2013/01/23/what-do-comic-books-teach-us-about-gender-attitudes/#507d552b2c16

This article was very useful as it showed me the significant influence cultural aspects have on the way gender is represented in comics. It also talked about certain things being a reaction to third wave feminism which sparked my research into different waves of feminism. This was written by a woman, meaning it was slightly biased to the way women are portrayed in comics and put male characters in a slightly negative light. Being a woman could mean the writer has social group power over other females reading it, such as myself, as it is likely to impact me more than a male reader.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portrayal_of_women_in_American_comics

I found this webpage very useful as it gave me an overview of the history of comics which I found very useful in terms of being able to analyse context. The main issue with the website ‘wikipedia’ is that the pages can be edited by any member of the public which could be a major issue if some of the information I collected was inaccurate.

http://www.academia.edu/20166079/Female_Representation_in_Comics_and_Graphic_Novels_Exploring_Classroom_Study_with_Critical_Visual_Literacy

This source wasn’t particularly useful as I didn’t use much of it to inform my research. However, it did zoom in on the character of Wonder Woman which did compliment the analysis of her from my primary sources. This was an academic paper so would not be very biased as all the information would be carefully collected and fact-checked.

https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1090&context=mcnair

The only really useful part of this source was the section that talked about social role theory. This was something I felt I could easily apply to the annotations of my primary sources. This was written for an academic research journal so again, is unlikely to be biased. The author of this report would have instrumental power as a result of the responsibility they have to communicate accurate information.

https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/us-history/postwarera/1960s-america/a/second-wave-feminism

This source was useful for providing social context for primary sources from the 60s however, this webpage was incredibly detailed so I found I couldn’t make use of a lot of the information. The website aims to provide education which makes the source less biased as they’re going to inform their audience with true facts.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_revolution_in_1960s_United_States

This webpage wasn’t particularly useful to me although it was helpful to know that this was a social movement that happened. Similar to another one of my secondary sources, it is a wikipedia page so does have bias with regards to the fact that anyone could’ve published the information.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/feminism/The-third-wave-of-feminism

The last secondary source I used was this website which was useful in giving me context for some of the more recent primary sources I used. However, I didn’t use many recent comic book excerpts so realistically I didn’t use this information that much. The company ‘britannica’ who created the website have a purpose of sharing factual information and use experts so the information is unlikely to be biased.

Investigation Evaluation

INTRODUCTION

The focus of my investigation was around the question ‘Does the language used in superhero comics reinforce gender roles and stereotypes at the time of publication?’ Looking at this question more closely, I decided to narrow the genre of ‘superhero comics’ down to just Marvel and DC comics as these are the characters I knew the most about. I also conducted some research into gender roles, particularly how they have been traditionally conveyed in comic books. And being able to analyse if the gender roles conveyed in the comics were representative of the time period in which they were published meant I had to take primary sources from a variety of decades.

generic introduction

The hypothesis for my research was that the language of the characters, both male and female, would be an accurate representation of their traditional gender roles at the time the comic was published. I started by researching the topic of gender identity in superhero comics, taking information from secondary sources like an article from the OpenLearn website from the Open University entitled ‘Superqueeroes: Gender and superheroes’. From this I learned that superhero comics tend to focus on binaries (two genders- male and female), and that the audience doesn’t question this. I also used an article from Forbes website titled ‘What do comic books teach us about gender attitudes’ which suggested that historical contexts have a huge impact over how women are represented in comics. I then researched historical and social contexts of gender identity, mainly referring to the Wikipedia page ‘Portrayal of Women in American Comics’. I took excerpts from Wonder Woman, Superman, Spider-Man, Justice League, and The Avengers to use for my primary data. I took the comic strips from issues over a period of time for example, taking one from the 60s and one from the 80s to see how gender identity in comics has changed over time.

evaluating hypothesis

ORIGINAL HYPOTHESIS

Does the language in comic books reflect the changing attitudes to gender identity?

EVALUATION OF HYPOTHESIS

Whilst investigating this hypothesis, my research has started to take a different direction. I have mainly been investigating whether the language in comic books conveys traditional gender roles and stereotypes, specifically looking at traditional gender stereotypes for females as well as how the concept of toxic masculinity is portrayed in the male superheroes’ language.  My expectations were that both male and female characters would be portrayed to be true to their gender stereotypes.

So far, my primary sources have both supported and questioned my hypothesis. When looking at female characters, I have found that between the 1950s and 90s, their portrayal in comic books fits their stereotypes at the time. However, before the 50s and after the 90s, this is not always the case. When looking at male characters, almost all (apart from Spider-Man) have supported ideas of toxic masculinity in one way or another, showing strength to be the most favourable attribute a man can have because it is the one that decides how ‘manly’ they will be perceived to be.

the avengers annotations

The Avengers (1966)

Key Findings

  • Female character’s language use focuses on males and comes in the form of thought bubbles not speech, using super politeness and interrogatives to show uncertainty
  • Competition between male characters- boasting about their strength suggesting value of greater strength meaning more manly
  • Male character perceived as more inferior uses more colloquialisms- idiolect showing inferiority. The fact he doesn’t get the girl suggests only the manliest men are ‘worthy’ (ideas of toxic masculinity)

The Avengers (1993)

Key Findings

  • Semantic fields show female character (Black Widow) taking on traditionally male role and not portrayed as a villain
  • nicknames show a portrayal of friendship between Captain America and Black Widow- breaks comic book tropes
  • Female character portrayed as more authoritative through use of declaratives and terms of address which show an equal importance between male and female character

primary data- spider man

The amazing spider man (1969)

Key findings

  • Age has significant impact- language is very different to adult superheroes
  • Implied emotional connections through pragmatics and concrete noun- unusual for male characters (emotion is sign of weakness)
  • Still consistent sense of masculinity- attack words ending in plosives, romanticises violence through positive pre-modifiers

the amazing spider man (1982)

Key findings

  • strong sense of arrogance- could be sarcastic response to recent feminist movements
  • focus on physical strength and abilities- conveys idea of masculinity (fits ideologies of toxic masculinity)
  • female character in traditionally male job role- suggests some development of attitudes towards women however she is the women- idea of powerful women being conveyed as villains

lecture notes

THEN

  • Swift 1712- women likely to use soft consonants and vowels and liquids e.g. r, y
  • Jesperson 1922- women speak softly and politely with less varied vocabularies and diminutives (e.g. teeny weeny), constructing sentences loosely- could apply to very early versions of comics

NOW

  • Meyerhoff 2006- a speaker speaks in a certain way not because they are a certain gender but because they are playing that role e.g. women speaking soft because they’re playing that role

GENDER

Gender is not the same as sex. Gender is a social construct NOT biological e.g. something you can identify as, it can change.

In terms of femininity and masculinity- it’s something you do, a way you behave and is not tied in with a corresponding sex anymore, at least try not to

UK genders are still binary- male or female

DEFECIT MODEL OF GENDER

women are encouraged to speak a certain way- a good way to speak to be treated as deficient and get what you want

DOMINANCE MODEL OF GENDER

men interrupt women more than women and are more dominant in interaction- ties in with power dynamics (men having more power)

DIFFERENCE MODEL OF GENDER

there is no dominance or deficit, just difference between men and women, they have different aims in conversations e.g. men seek upper hand and women negotiate solidarity

DYNAMIC MODEL OF GENDER

gender isn’t seen in terms of men and women it’s how you create you identity which can be negotiated- moving beyond binary oppositions

all of these models can be found in aspects of superhero comics

IN RELATION TO SUPERHERO COMICS

  • structuralist codes- conversation achieved through cultural codes
  • logemes and syntactemes

SEMIOTICS- the theory of signs (signified and signifier)

  • Peirce- three ways of signifying something- icons, indices and symbols
  • icons- something that looks like what you’re trying to signify
  • indices- analog moving representation of what you’re trying to signify e.g. temperature gauge on car
  • symbols- conventional symbolic system